Leica Ultravid 10x25 vs Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25
vs
Quick take: The Leica Ultravid 10x25 costs $49 less; the Leica Ultravid 10x25 reaches farther (10x vs 8x); the Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25 has a wider field of view (357 vs 273 ft @ 1000 yds).
Field of view, to scale
you2505007501000 yds
Distance200 yds
Leica Ultravid 10x255.2°
55 ft wide at 200 yds
Swarovski CL Pocket 8x256.8°
71 ft wide at 200 yds ≈ 1.8 school buses
Top-down view · drawn to true scale — no exaggeration
| Spec | Leica Ultravid 10x25 | Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25 |
|---|---|---|
| Approx. price | ~$1,000 | ~$1,049 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Use case | General Purpose | General Purpose |
| Magnification | 10x | 8x |
| Objective | 25mm | 25mm |
| Exit pupil | 2.5mm | 3.1mm |
| Field of view | 273 ft @ 1000 yds | 357 ft @ 1000 yds |
| Eye relief | 15mm | 17mm |
| Close focus | 8.2 ft | 8.2 ft |
| Prism | Roof | Roof |
| Glass | HD | Standard |
| Coating | Fully Multi-Coated | Fully Multi-Coated |
| Weight | 8.8 oz | 12.2 oz |
| Dimensions | 4.4 x 4.1 in | 4.3 x 3.9 in |
| Warranty | 10 Years | Lifetime |
Feature comparison
Leica Ultravid 10x25
- ✓ED Glass
- ✓Phase-Corrected
- ✗Dielectric Coating
- ✓Waterproof
- ✓Fogproof
- ✗Image Stabilized
- ✗Tripod Adaptable
- ✗Magnesium Body
- ✗Locking Diopter
Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25
- ✗ED Glass
- ✓Phase-Corrected
- ✗Dielectric Coating
- ✓Waterproof
- ✓Fogproof
- ✗Image Stabilized
- ✗Tripod Adaptable
- ✗Magnesium Body
- ✗Locking Diopter